Best Factorio Server Hosting 2026
Factorio servers become more demanding in a very different way from most multiplayer games. A four-player world can start tiny and eventually grow into a multi-planet factory containing thousands of machines, huge logistics networks and years of saved progress. Therefore, we rank hosts on long-term resource flexibility, CPU and memory performance, mod support, backups, server location and how easily you can move or upgrade a mature factory.
Our top Factorio server hosts
Indifferent Broccoli is our overall winner because its free trial and uncapped-RAM model fit Factorio’s long-term growth unusually well. Meanwhile, Kinetic Hosting combines excellent pricing with an exceptionally strong London CPU pool, while LOW.MS gives you 10GB from the start plus easy switching between Factorio branches.
Indifferent Broccoli
≈£9.60 ($12.99) · 6 players
- Trial requires no credit card
- No fixed RAM ceiling as the save grows
- Seven-day refund after purchase
Kinetic Hosting
≈£3.69 ($4.99) · 4GB
- 8GB plan is only ≈£5.91 ($7.99)
- DDR5 and NVMe performance nodes
- No artificial Factorio slot cap
LOW.MS
≈£6.48 ($8.76) · 10GB
- Stable and experimental branch switching
- Cloud backups with one-click restore
- RAM upgrades up to 30GB
GBP equivalents use exchange rates checked on 16 August 2026. Provider checkout prices and currency conversion can change.
Best Factorio server hosting compared
These are the ten Factorio hosting providers we could currently verify. Prices are shown in GBP first for easier comparison, while the provider’s USD price is shown alongside where applicable.
| Provider | Price | Location | RAM | Best for | Trial / backup | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
Indifferent Broccoli
Best long-term flexibility
|
≈£9.60 $12.99 · 6 players | Frankfurt / EU | Uncapped | No hard RAM ceiling · mods · full files | 2-day free trial 7-day refund | Visit |
|
2
Kinetic Hosting
Best CPU value
|
≈£3.69 $4.99 · 4GB | London | 4–124GB | 7950X / 9950X pool · no player cap | 5 backups 7-day refund | Visit |
|
3
LOW.MS
Best 10GB bundle
|
≈£6.48 $8.76 | London | 10GB base | Stable + experimental branches | Cloud backups 5-day refund | Visit |
|
4
Host Havoc
Best mature platform
|
≈£7.39 $10.00 | London | Managed | Own hardware fleet · FTP · mods | Offsite backups | Visit |
|
5
AleForge
Best budget option
|
≈£1.47 $1.99 · 2GB | Frankfurt | 2–64GB | Very cheap entry · premium Ryzen tiers | Backup tools | Visit |
|
6
Wabbanode
Flexible CPU tiers
|
≈£6.61 $8.94 · 6GB example | London | 1–16GB+ | EPYC budget · Ryzen 7950X performance | Panel backups | Visit |
|
7
Nitrado
Flexible short rentals
|
≈£4.61 ≈$6.18 · 4 slots | London available | Managed | Short terms · game switching | Daily backups | Visit |
|
8
GPORTAL
Simple prepaid setup
|
≈£11.52 $15.59 · 10 slots | Central Europe | Managed | Easy panel · FTP mod workflow | 50GB backup space | Visit |
|
9
GGServers
Good mod tooling
|
≈£4.44 $6.00 · 2GB | Europe | 2–32GB | Mod installer · FTP · unlimited slots | Automated backups | Visit |
|
10
Apex Hosting
Beginner-friendly panel
|
≈£2.95 $3.99 · 1GB | Global | 1GB+ | Easy setup · higher-performance tiers | Automatic backups | Visit |
GBP conversions use exchange rates checked on 16 August 2026: $1 ≈ £0.73929 and €1 ≈ £0.85499. Exact checkout prices may differ slightly as exchange rates move.
Factorio server hosting reviews — #1 to #10
The table gives you the quick comparison. However, Factorio is unusual enough that the reasoning behind each position matters, so every provider in the ranking gets a full game-specific review below.
Indifferent Broccoli takes first place because its hosting model is unusually well suited to Factorio. Instead of assigning every plan a strict 2GB, 4GB or 8GB memory ceiling, Factorio plans are primarily limited by player count while RAM is uncapped at the plan level.
That does not magically eliminate Factorio’s CPU bottlenecks. Nevertheless, it removes one artificial limit as a save becomes larger. A fresh factory may need very little memory, whereas a long-running Space Age world with more explored surfaces, entities and mods can consume considerably more.
Moreover, the two-day free trial requires no payment card. That means you can upload your actual save and mod list rather than benchmarking an empty world. If the factory maintains 60 UPS and memory behaviour looks healthy, you know the service works before spending anything.
The main downside is location. European servers include Frankfurt, Amsterdam and Roubaix rather than London. However, Factorio is considerably less latency-sensitive than competitive shooters, so nearby continental Europe remains perfectly reasonable for most British players.
- Two-day trial without a credit card
- No fixed RAM cap per plan
- Full file access
- Mod support
- Seven-day refund after purchase
- Several nearby European locations
- No London location
- Costs more than several fixed-RAM competitors
- Uncapped RAM does not solve CPU-limited UPS
Kinetic Hosting is the strongest alternative if raw price-to-performance matters more than a free trial. The 4GB plan converts to roughly £3.69 per month, while 8GB is only around £5.91 ($7.99).
More importantly, Kinetic publishes meaningful hardware information. Its London Performance pool includes Ryzen 9 7950X, Ryzen 9 9950X and EPYC 4564P systems with DDR5 memory and NVMe storage.
Factorio benefits from strong per-core performance as well as a fast memory subsystem. Therefore, this hardware profile is much more relevant than simply advertising a huge number of CPU threads. Kinetic also avoids arbitrary player limits, so the server is constrained by actual performance rather than a purchased slot count.
Five backup slots, SFTP, schedules and resource tiers extending far beyond normal Factorio requirements make scaling straightforward. Consequently, Kinetic would be our preferred choice for players who specifically want a London node and highly transparent hardware.
- Excellent price
- London location
- 7950X / 9950X hardware pool
- DDR5 and NVMe
- No artificial player cap
- Large RAM upgrade range
- No free trial
- Exact CPU depends on available node
LOW.MS offers one of the easiest Factorio packages to understand. For approximately £6.48 per month, the entry configuration includes 10GB RAM and 50 player slots.
The slot count is mostly marketing for a game normally played by far fewer people. However, the included memory is genuinely useful because it gives a long-running save plenty of room before an upgrade becomes necessary.
LOW.MS also earns extra points during the current Factorio 2.0-to-2.1 transition. Stable and experimental branches can be selected through its server management system, while automatic cloud backups make it straightforward to preserve a 2.0 save before experimenting with 2.1.
London availability is another advantage for British players. Depending on ISP routing, London game servers can often produce very low latency from much of the UK, although actual ping still varies by connection and location.
- 10GB RAM included
- London location
- Stable and experimental branches
- Cloud backups
- Five-day refund
- Resource upgrades available
- 50 slots add little value for most Factorio groups
- Exact London CPU is less transparent than Kinetic
Host Havoc is a more traditional managed game host than the providers above. It operates its own broader hardware fleet and offers Factorio through an established control-panel environment with mod support, file management and web-console access.
London is available, while the underlying fleet includes both Ryzen and Xeon hardware with NVMe storage. Host Havoc does not promise one identical processor for every Factorio order, so we would not rank it above Kinetic purely on CPU specifications.
Nevertheless, its offsite backups and mature restoration workflow are particularly attractive for Factorio. Losing a save representing several hundred hours of factory design is a considerably bigger problem than losing a disposable multiplayer match.
Support is another strength. Therefore, Host Havoc makes sense for groups that want managed infrastructure and quick assistance rather than the absolute cheapest RAM allocation.
- London location
- Own broader hardware fleet
- Mod support
- Full FTP access
- Offsite backups
- Mature support operation
- More expensive than Kinetic
- Resource allocation less explicit than LOW.MS
AleForge is the most interesting provider for somebody who simply wants the cheapest permanent Factorio server possible. Its budget tier starts around £1.47 ($1.99) for 2GB RAM.
That is enough for a small fresh vanilla factory. Moreover, AleForge allows customers to scale through much larger memory configurations, so the low entry price does not lock you into a tiny server permanently.
However, Factorio megabases are exactly where we would avoid choosing solely by price. AleForge offers faster premium hardware tiers, and those become much more relevant once UPS starts depending on CPU and memory performance rather than capacity alone.
Frankfurt is also reasonably close to Britain, although players specifically prioritising the shortest network route should prefer one of the London hosts above.
- Extremely low starting price
- RAM scaling beyond entry plan
- Unlimited player slots
- Premium hardware options
- Nearby Frankfurt location
- Budget hardware is not ideal for extreme megabases
- No London node in the verified Factorio configuration
Wabbanode is interesting because its product structure gives Factorio players a choice between cheaper server hardware and faster performance-oriented nodes.
A six-gigabyte configuration comes in at roughly £6.61 in our current example. Meanwhile, customers building a much larger factory can move toward Ryzen 7950X-class performance rather than simply adding RAM to a slower processor.
That distinction is valuable for Factorio because resource requirements change in two stages. First, a world may need additional memory as it expands. Later, however, the harder limit often becomes how quickly the simulation itself can process every update.
London availability also makes Wabbanode a sensible regional choice. Nevertheless, Kinetic currently offers stronger value and clearer Factorio-specific hardware information, which keeps Wabbanode in the middle of the ranking.
- London servers
- Budget and performance CPU tiers
- Ryzen 7950X option
- Flexible memory allocation
- Panel backup tools
- Kinetic offers stronger current value
- Smaller provider than several competitors
Nitrado is less compelling for a permanent megabase than our top providers, but it offers something different: highly flexible rental periods and small player-count configurations.
The four-slot example converts to roughly £4.61 per month. Therefore, a small group can run a private Factorio world without buying the oversized 50-player configurations some competitors use as their default.
London is currently available, while daily backups and game switching add convenience. Nitrado also maintains products for current Factorio branches, which is useful while stable and experimental releases coexist.
However, resource allocation is not as transparent as Kinetic or LOW.MS. As a result, we prefer Nitrado for convenience and short-term flexibility rather than serious megabase performance benchmarking.
- London location available
- Small slot configurations
- Flexible rental periods
- Daily backups
- Easy game switching
- Hardware allocation is less transparent
- Not our first choice for an extreme megabase
GPORTAL focuses on convenience. Servers can be created quickly through a familiar game-hosting panel, while FTP access gives advanced users enough control to manage Factorio saves and mods manually.
The standout feature is its generous backup allocation. Factorio worlds are relatively small compared with many survival games, so 50GB of backup capacity is ample for keeping multiple historical saves.
However, the current 10-slot price converts to roughly £11.52 per month. Consequently, GPORTAL is significantly more expensive than LOW.MS, Kinetic and several other alternatives without providing an obvious Factorio-specific performance advantage.
We therefore recommend it primarily to existing GPORTAL users or players who prioritise a straightforward prepaid ecosystem over price-to-performance.
- Very easy setup
- FTP access
- Large backup allocation
- Established hosting platform
- Expensive relative to competitors
- No current London advantage in our comparison
- Hardware details less compelling than top picks
GGServers is a sensible lower-cost choice for modded Factorio. Its plans start around £4.44 for 2GB and can scale through much larger memory allocations as the server grows.
The integrated mod workflow is the strongest part of the package. Factorio has one of gaming’s best mod ecosystems, so making it easy to deploy and update modifications can matter more to many groups than an enormous slot allowance.
FTP access is also available, while automated backups provide a recovery path if a mod update damages the current save. Moreover, unlimited player slots avoid charging extra simply because additional friends join.
Nevertheless, GGServers does not offer the same current CPU transparency as Kinetic or the uncapped-memory model of Indifferent Broccoli. That keeps it lower in a performance-focused Factorio ranking.
- Affordable entry tier
- Integrated mod tooling
- FTP access
- Automated backups
- Unlimited slots
- Large RAM upgrade range
- Less hardware transparency than top hosts
- 2GB entry plan can be outgrown by a large save
Apex Hosting is designed around ease of use. The control panel makes launching and managing a Factorio server approachable even if you have never touched SteamCMD or a Linux command line.
The entry tier starts at approximately £2.95 ($3.99), although 1GB is best viewed as a small-world starting point rather than an allocation for a mature Space Age factory.
Automatic backups are included, while higher-performance server options are available for users who outgrow the basic hardware. Therefore, Apex can scale beyond the entry tier without forcing users into self-hosting.
However, Factorio rewards transparent CPU and memory performance more than most games. Since other hosts provide stronger hardware information or substantially better resource value, Apex finishes tenth despite its excellent usability.
- Very beginner-friendly
- Low starting price
- Automatic backups
- Global infrastructure
- Higher-performance options available
- 1GB entry tier is easy to outgrow
- Less Factorio-specific hardware transparency
- Top competitors offer better value
Factorio 2.1 is changing what we want from a host
Factorio 2.0 remains the stable branch, while 2.1 is currently being distributed through the experimental channel. Wube has described 2.1 as the final major Factorio update before the game moves into long-term maintenance.
Consequently, version control is unusually useful right now. A production server running a mature modpack should not be forced onto an experimental release simply because it is newer.
Why Factorio saves become more demanding over time
A new Factorio server is lightweight. However, that first-hour benchmark is not representative of the same world hundreds of hours later.
As players explore new chunks, build additional planets and surfaces, expand rail networks, place more machines and install larger mods, both the save and the active simulation become more complex.
More surfaces, entities and mod state increase the amount of information the server needs to keep available while running.
A large factory contains vastly more machines, logistics systems, trains and scripts that need to be processed every tick.
Therefore, we prefer providers that let the same server scale instead of forcing users to migrate when the factory outgrows its original allocation.
UPS matters more than player slots
Factorio normally targets 60 Updates Per Second. At 60 UPS, the simulation progresses at full speed. When the server takes too long to process a game update, UPS falls and the entire factory effectively begins running more slowly.
This is why a four-player megabase can be more demanding than a 30-player early-game world. The number of players matters, but the amount of factory simulation is often much more important.
The game is running at normal simulation speed. If your server remains here, upgrading hardware will not meaningfully improve gameplay.
Your factory is beginning to approach the available simulation budget. CPU upgrades or factory optimisation may help.
Simulation slowdown becomes obvious. At this point, faster hardware or major factory optimisation can produce a noticeable improvement.
How much RAM does a Factorio server need?
| Factory | Good starting RAM | What to watch |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh vanilla world | 2–3GB | RAM is unlikely to be the bottleneck. |
| Growing Space Age world | 3–4GB | Leave headroom for additional surfaces and exploration. |
| Large or lightly modded world | 4–6GB | CPU quality starts becoming increasingly important. |
| Heavy modpack | 6–8GB+ | Monitor actual RAM and UPS rather than guessing. |
| Extreme megabase | 8GB+ as required | UPS is often CPU or memory-latency limited before RAM capacity becomes the final limit. |
Factorio clients and servers need matching versions
Factorio’s multiplayer simulation is deterministic. Therefore, the server and every connected player need compatible game versions and the same gameplay-changing mod set.
Do not move a mature modded server to Factorio 2.1 simply because the version number is higher.
Important overhaul and utility mods may not immediately support the newest experimental branch.
Create both a host-side restore point and a downloaded copy before changing branches.
Load the factory, connect with the real client mod set and verify UPS before treating the new branch as permanent.
Backups deserve more weight in Factorio than most reviews give them
One Factorio save can represent months or even years of collaborative design. Consequently, backup quality is not an optional checkbox when we rank providers.
Automatic snapshots, downloadable archives and one-click restores work particularly well before branch changes.
Enough for a normal rotating schedule, while SFTP makes local archives simple.
Backup data can be restored independently if a save, mod or server update causes trouble.
Before major updates, download the save yourself so rolling backups cannot overwrite every pre-update restore point.
You may not need paid Factorio hosting
Factorio is one of the few games where a free solution can genuinely be good enough for occasional multiplayer. Wube provides a free headless dedicated server, while Factorio.zone can host temporary browser-managed servers without a monthly bill.
Good for occasional sessions. You can upload saves and mods, then move the world to a permanent paid host later if the group becomes more active.
The Linux headless server is free. However, you become responsible for networking, updates, backups and keeping the machine online.
Factorio server hosting FAQ
Indifferent Broccoli — Best Factorio Server Hosting 2026
Two-day no-card trial · no fixed RAM cap · mod support · full file access · European servers · seven-day refund · an unusually good fit for Factorio worlds that continue growing over hundreds of hours
Affiliate disclosure: we may earn a commission when you purchase through qualifying links at no additional cost to you. GBP equivalents use exchange rates checked on 16 August 2026 and may change.

Host Havoc
AleForge
Wabbanode
Nitrado
GPORTAL
GGServers